In Re A.B.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} The Ninth Appellate District has certified the following question to us after determining that its decision conflicts with a decision from the Eighth District: “After a child agency is granted temporary custody of a child and files a motion for permanent custody, does a juvenile court have the authority to place the child in a planned permanent living arrangement when the agency does not request this disposition?”
{¶ 2} For the reasons that follow, we answer this question in the negative. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the trial court.
I.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Francis v. SoursOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. TuomalaOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- In re GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re C.F.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re B.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. KnowltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re C.T.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re seldon/boyd Children, C-070440 (9-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.