Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William R. Lamb

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2015No. 2012AP000486-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Attorney William R. Lamb has appealed from the report of the referee, Attorney James R. Erickson, which found, based on Attorney Lamb's stipulation and no contest plea, that Attorney Lamb had engaged in 75 counts of professional misconduct arising out of ten client representations, that his license to practice law in Wisconsin should be revoked, that he should be required to pay restitution in the total amount of $21,580, and that he should be required to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $8,875.90 as of September 16, 2014.

¶ 2. Having considered the referee's…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John J. BalistrieriWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. KellyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael B. PaddenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API