Legal Opinion
Rychlik v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 23, 1955No. Civ. 6494PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Chief Judge.
The above entitled matter comes before this Court on an order to show cause obtained by the plaintiff why an order should not be made restraining and granting certain injunctive relief against the defendants, Hartman, Sites, and Gaily, individually and as members of and representatives of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen (hereinafter called “BRT”) and the Pennsylvania Railroad (hereinafter called “Penn”). By consent of the parties, the BRT was permitted to intervene as defendants in place of the individuals, Hartman, Sites, and Gaily.
The complaint was verified, and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. RychlikSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shiels v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1957
- Weaver v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Evans v. McClellanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Rychlik v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.