Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Pennsylvania Railroad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 29, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERLANDS, District Judge.

This motion for summary judgment by defendant-railroad is granted for the reasons set forth in this opinion.

The question presented by this motion is whether or not the disputes clause eon-tained in a collective bargaining agreement, which provides that decisions of the particular System Board of Adjustment shall be “final and binding,” precludes the bringing of the present action by plaintiff, a discharged employee of defendant.

The complaint is predicated upon a claim that plaintiff, a private patrolman formerly employed by defendant, was improperly discharged from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Washington Terminal Co. v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Bower v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  3. Reynolds v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. Michel v. Louisville & N. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. PopeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Belford Barnett v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashare LinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  3. D'AMICO v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Day v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
  5. Stranford v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API