Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Rychlik

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 25, 1957No. 56PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

Petitioner Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen is the collective bargaining representative for trainmen employed by the petitioner Railroad. In accordance with Section 2, Eleventh (a) and (c) of the Railway Labor Act,1 the Brotherhood and the Railroad negotiated a *482union-shop contract in 1952, which required trainmen employed by the Railroad to become members of and retain membership in the Brotherhood or in another labor organization “national in scope” and “organized in accordance with” the Railway Labor Act. Respondent Rychlik was employed as a trainman by the Railroad and was a member in good…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paul A.. Pigott v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  2. Rychlik v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1955
  3. United Railroad Operating Crafts v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. PyettSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Douglas T. Wightman v. Springfield Terminal Railway Company and United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  5. Felter v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API