Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
This case raises questions concerning the power of courts to protect Negro railroad employees from loss of their jobs under compulsion of a bargaining agreement which, to avoid a strike, the railroad made with an exclusively white man’s union. Respondent Simon Howard, a Frisco1 train employee for nearly forty years, *770brought this action on behalf of himself and other colored employees similarly situated.
In summary the complaint alleged: Negro employees such as respondent constituted a group called “train porters” although they actually performed all the duties of white “brakemen”; the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Graham v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by284 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
279 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.