Legal Opinion

Meyn v. City of Kansas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1913No. 18,398PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 1; Edward L. Fischer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Fred Meyn brought an action to restrain the city of Kansas City from entering into a contract with two railroads for the construction of a viaduct, and to enjoin proceedings under such contract, including the building of the viaduct. A preliminary injunction was refused, and judgment on the pleadings was rendered in favor of the defendants.. The plaintiff appeals.

The defendants, have made a showing that the acts sought to be enjoined have already been fully performed, and a dismissal is asked on that ground. The ordinary rule is that in that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Bitulithic Paving Co. v. Village of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Anderson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Bonnewell v. LoweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Cheesebrough v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Moses v. SalomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kelliher v. Stone & Webster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  2. Dickey Oil Co. v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Andeel v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Thompson-Hayward Chemical Co. v. Cyprus Mines Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
  5. Diehn v. PennerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API