Legal Opinion

Diehn v. Penner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1950No. 37,842PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This is an injunction proceeding wherein the plaintiff seeks to restrain the board of county commissioners of Johnson county, acting as the governing board of Mission Township Main Sewer District No. 1 of such county, and the contractor employed by such board to construct the improvement herein involved from utilizing a strip of plaintiff’s land in the construction of a permanent sewer on the ground the board had failed to acquire the right to take his property for that purpose under and by virtue of any valid condemnation proceeding. By…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dickey Oil Co. v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Central Bitulithic Paving Co. v. Village of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Meyn v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Bonnewell v. LoweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co. v. City of HiawathaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Randall v. SeemannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Andeel v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Thompson v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. Bumm v. ColvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API