Miller v. Mayo
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This action was brought to foreclose a lien for a street assessment upon real property of the defendant. A demurrer was filed to the complaint, which was overruled and answer filed. Trial was had, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff, as prayed for. From that, and an order denying a new trial, the appeal is taken.
1. The demurrer to the complaint should have been sustained. Section 7 of the act of March 18,1885, under which the work was authorized, provides that “ the expenses incurred for any work authorized by section 2 of this act .... shall be assessed upon the lots and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Ransome-Crummey Co. v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Greenwood v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900