Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Holloway

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2000No. 99-048PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 David W. Holloway (David) appeals from the judgment and order of the Ninth Judicial District Court, Glacier County, ordering that Cheryl Holloway (Cheryl), a/k/a Cheryl Woolsey, pay David one-half of the date-of-dissolution value of the family home and property (the house) upon its sale. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Issues

We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

¶2 1. Did the District Court properly construe Cheryl’s petition as a request to interpret the Agreement?

¶3 2. Did the District Court correctly interpret the Agreement?

¶4 3. Did the District Court err in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Miller v. HerbertMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re the Estate of HillMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ellingson Agency, Inc. v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Kottas v. KottasMontana Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mary J. Baker Revocable Trust v. Cenex Harvest States, Cooperatives, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re the Marriage of OehlkeMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Charles M. Bair Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Mularoni v. BingMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Yellowstone II Development Group, Inc. v. First American Title InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API