Legal Opinion

Miller v. Herbert

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1995No. 95-032PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

This is an appeal from a decision of the Third Judicial District Court, Anaconda-Deer Lodge County, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants/Respondents, Dave Herbert and Safeco Insurance Company. We affirm.

The issue on appeal is did the District Court err in granting summary judgment for the reason that Plaintifi/Appellant, Arthur D. Miller (Miller), failed to establish a material issue of fact?

Defendant/Respondent, Safeco Insurance Company (Safeco) moves this Court to dismiss this appeal.

The issue on Safeco’s motion to dismiss is whether Miller’s notice of appeal was timely? We deny…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Minnie v. City of RoundupMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Spain-Morrow Ranch, Inc. v. WestMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Brothers v. General Motors Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Morrow v. FBS Ins. Montana-Hoiness LabarMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Fauerso v. Maronick Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lee v. USAA Casualty InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Nelson v. DriscollMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Carr v. BettMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Haugen v. Blaine Bank of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API