Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Hill

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1997No. 96-235PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Appellant Louanne Woodford (Louanne) appeals the decision of the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Garfield County, holding that two disputed bank accounts were the property of Lou E. Hill’s probate estate, and further holding that Lou E. Hill (Hill) had not intended to leave the disputed accounts to Louanne as his joint tenant with right of survivorship. We reverse and remand.

ISSUES

The following issues are presented on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err in concluding that the disputed bank accounts were assets of Hill’s probate estate and not joint accounts with rights of survivorship…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daines v. KnightMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State Board of Equalization v. ColeMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Ducham v. TumaMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kohne v. YostMontana Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Eschenbacher v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Oster v. Valley CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Weaver v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In Re the Marriage of HollowayMontana Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API