Legal Opinion

Ellingson Agency, Inc. v. Baltrusch

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1987No. 87-44PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

Defendants Carl and Otto Baltrusch appeal the judgment of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, which awarded to plaintiff Ellingson Agency, Inc., a broker’s commission, attorney fees and interest in the total amount of $148,308.91 and dismissed defendants’ counterclaim. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Three issues are presented for our review:

1. Did the District Court err when it granted summary judgment in favor of Ellingson?

*3622. Did the District Court err when it granted Ellingson’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the Baltrusches’ counterclaim?

3. Did the District…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ehly v. CadyMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CumiskeyMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Felbinger & Co. v. TraiforosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Fulton v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Flemmer v. MingMontana Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dern v. DernMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Matter of Estate of Dern Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re the Marriage of HollowayMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Fox Grain and Cattle Co. v. MaxwellMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bills v. Hannah, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API