Legal Opinion
Potter v. Potter
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 2002No. S-9951PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*727OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Under review in this case is an order that increased the child support that David H. Potter must pay and modified his visitation privileges. We conclude that the order is sustainable as to child support but not as to visitation because no notice was given that the latter issue was to be tried.
David Potter and Shelly Brewster divorced in 1990. The decree incorporated a custody and support agreement which nominally gave Brewster primary physical custody of the parties' daughter, Sunny, but included a detailed visitation order that essentially allowed the parties to have…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Bennett v. BennettAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Morino v. SwaymanAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Turinsky v. LongAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Karpuleon v. KarpuleonAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jeff AC, Jr. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Price v. EasthamAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Geldermann v. GeldermannAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Reeves v. Godspeed Props., LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- DeNardo v. MaassenAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.