Legal Opinion
Armendariz v. Penman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 1996No. Nos. 93-55393, 93-55587 and 93-55748PublishedCited by 268 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FLETCHER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Chief Judge WALLACE; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge SCHROEDER; Partial Concurrence by Judge BEEZER.
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of summary judgment to city employees who claim that they are entitled to qualified immunity. The recitation of events below necessarily follows the allegations of the parties — nothing has been put to the crucible of trial.
Several years ago the City of San Bernardino embarked on a program of vigorously enforcing its housing code. The…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by268 opinions
- Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Cunningham v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Bowlby v. City of Aberdeen, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mabe v. San Bernardino CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.