Legal Opinion

Spore v. Washington

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1929No. Docket No. 6524PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The action was instituted by plaintiff to recover damages resultant from personal injuries sustained by him.

At the outset the action was against appellant and others. At the trial a judgment of nonsuit was ordered as to the remaining defendants and the case proceeded and judgment was entered against appellant alone. The case was tried by a jury. In setting forth such of the facts as may be necessary, we will avoid all reference to any of the original defendants and treat the case throughout as against the appealing defendant.

Appellant was the owner of a certain building in the city…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Siggins v. McGillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  3. Davis v. Pac. Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Brown v. PepperdineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. H. C. Capwell Co. v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Johnston v. De La Guerra Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. DeGraf v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Siegel v. Detroit City Ice & Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API