Legal Opinion
Brown v. Pepperdine
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1921No. Civ. No. 3866PublishedCited by 19 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the defendants upon plaintiff’s refusal to further amend his complaint after a general demurrer thereto had been sustained.
The amended complaint alleges that the defendants Pepperdine and McCalla were copartners doing business under the firm name of Western Auto Supply Agency, and as such copartners conducted their business in San Francisco, at No. 283 Golden Gate Avenue; that on the twenty-sixth day of June, 1919, the plaintiff, being engaged as a salesman in the employ of the California Commerce Corporation, entered the basement of said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Giannini v. CampodonicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Crosby v. Fresno Fruit Growers' Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Foley v. HornungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by19 opinions
- Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Johnston v. De La Guerra Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Bellon v. Silver Gate Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Demmer v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.