Legal Opinion
In Re DOT Hill Systems Corp. Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 2, 2008No. Case 06CV228 JLS (WMc)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE and (2) GRANTING MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY IN STATE-COURT ACTIONS
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are two motions by Dot Hill Systems Corporation, James L. Lambert, Dana W. Kammers-gard, Preston S. Romm, and William R. Sauey 1 (“defendants”). Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended consolidated class action complaint (“SACC”). (Doc. No. 73.) Pursuant to the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (“SLU-SA”), defendants also move for this Court to stay discovery in two state-court…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Remec Incorporated Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Scripsamerica, Inc. v. Ironridge Global LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Sterling Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
- ScripsAmerica, Inc. v. Ironridge Global LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Strougo v. RealNetworks IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024