Legal Opinion
In Re Remec Incorporated Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 21, 2010No. 3:04-cr-01948PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS;
[Doc. Nos. 173, 194, 263, 308, 310, 336]
DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court are four summary judgment motions and several evidentiary motions in these consolidated securities fraud cases against Defendants REMEC, Inc., Ronald E. Ragland, and Winston E. Hickman. In sum, for the reasons stated below, and because the Court finds that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on the element of scienter, judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants and the case shall be dismissed with prejudice. 1
1.…
2Cases cited99 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- FindWhat Investor Group v. FindWhat. ComCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Glickenhaus & Company v. Household International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Public Employees' Retirement System v. Amedisys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- In re KLX, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.