Snodgrass v. Rissler & McMurry Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
These consolidated appeals arise out of a condemnation action initiated by Rissler & McMurry Company (Rissler) to obtain access to a ten-acre limestone mining quarry. In case 94-278, George and Phyllis Snodgrass and Rodney Stalkup (hereinafter Snodgrass), the owners of the land which Rissler sought to condemn, appeal the denial of an award of attorney fees. In case 94-279, Rissler appeals the awarding of costs to the landowners and the denial of an award of costs to Ris-sler.
We affirm.
In case 94-278, Snodgrass presents three issues for review:
1. Does Wyoming follow the general…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. ChismAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Devous v. Wyoming State Board of Medical ExaminersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Cheek v. McGowan Elec. Supply Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Sheridan Commercial Park, Inc. v. BriggsWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank Wyoming, N.A. v. HodderWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- McLain v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Schaub v. WilsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Board of County Commissioners v. State Ex Rel. YeadonWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Cowardin v. FinnertyWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.