Arendell v. Auto Parts Club, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
I. Introduction
In this case we hold that a tort action for an employer’s negligent or reckless failure to provide adequate premises security despite knowledge of danger to its employees is precluded by the exclusive remedy provisions of the workers’ compensation law (Lab. Code, §§ 3600, 3601, 3602).
Thomas J. Arendell and Chase Wilson appeal from a summary judgment, based on workers’ compensation exclusivity, in their personal injury action against their employer, Auto Parts Club, Inc. We affirm.
II. Background
On January 5, 1993, three youths assaulted Arendell and Wilson at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Fermino v. Fedco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Avila v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Iverson v. Atlas Pacific EngineeringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lenk v. Total-Western, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Zavala v. ArceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Muller v. Automobile Club of So. CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Marich v. MGM/UA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Vuillemainroy v. American Rock & Asphalt, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.