Fermino v. Fedco, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
In this case we consider whether an employee subject to false imprisonment at the hands of her employer may sue that employer in a civil action, or whether such a suit is barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Lab. Code, §§ 3600, 3602). We conclude that her suit would not be barred, because an employer that falsely imprisons its employee has stepped outside its proper role, and an injury resulting therefrom is beyond the scope of what we have termed the “compensation bargain.”
I. Statement of Facts
Because this case comes to us after the sustaining…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Moorpark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- CHARLES J. VACANTI v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Asgari v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.