Legal Opinion

Smith v. Amsbery

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 6, 2021No. 2:19-cv-01912Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JEFFREY GLEN SMITH, Case No. 2:19-cv-01912-IM Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. BRIGITTE AMSBERRY, Respondent. IMMERGUT, District Judge. Petitioner Jeffrey Glen Smith (“Petitioner”), an individual in custody at the Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, brings this habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging the ineffectiveness of trial counsel. Because Petitioner’s claim is procedurally defaulted, Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 31) is DENIED, and this proceeding is DISMISSED,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API