Spence v. Allstate Insurance Co.

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

In this action to recover under a fire insurance policy, the appellants James Spence and Pamela Spence present several issues for our determination, including: (1) whether the Court of. Appeals erred in holding that the “innocent co-insured doctrine” did not apply to this case because of the language in the policy, thereby denying any recovery under the policy to the innocent eo-insured — James Spence; (2) whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s ruling that increased the judgment on the insurance company’s indemnity claim against Pamela Spence…