State v. Pendergrass
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
The threshold issue in this appeal is whether the defendant, Sheryl L. Pender-grass, in pleading guilty to a drug charge, explicitly reserved the right to appeal a certified question of law that was dispositive of the case, in accordance with the requirements of Tenn. R.Crim. P. 37(b)(2)(iv) as it was interpreted by this Court in State v. Preston, 759 S.W.2d 647 (Tenn.1988).
The Court of Criminal Appeals held that the defendant had substantially complied with Rule 37 to reserve for appeal a certified question of law, but affirmed the trial court’s judgment on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. PrestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Spence v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by299 opinions
- State v. MixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- State of Tennessee v. Adrian R. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Powers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- David CANTRELL v. Joe EASTERLING, WardenTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Creech v. AddingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
294 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.