Legal Opinion

State v. Mixon

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1999No. 02S01-9804-CC-00034PublishedCited by 566 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, J.

We granted this appeal to determine: (1) when a judgment becomes “final” and triggers the one-year coram nobis statute of limitations; and (2) whether a petition for writ of error coram nobis may be filed in the trial court during the pendency of an appeal as of right from a conviction.

We conclude that a judgment becomes final, and the one-year coram nobis statute of limitations begins to run, thirty days after entry of the judgment in the trial court if no post-trial motion is filed, or upon entry of an order disposing of a timely filed post-trial motion. As a result, in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Duchac v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by566 opinions

  1. State v. VasquesTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Dellinger v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Workman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ricky HARRIS v. STATE of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. GillilandTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

561 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API