Legal Opinion
Magraw v. Donovan
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1958No. Civ. 2981PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs, citizens and voters of the state of Minnesota and residents of several of the more densely populated areas of that state, principally the urban sections, bring this action asking that the 1913 Minnesota Legislative Redistricting Act (Chapter 91, Minn.Laws 1913; Minn.Stat.1953, § 2.02 et seq.; M.S.A. § 2.02 et seq.) be declared invalid and that the Secretary of State and County Auditors be enjoined from operating the election machinery at future elections under that law.
Plaintiffs contend that, by virtue of the substantial increase in population and major shifts of it within…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Chicago v. Fieldcrest Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Albertson v. Millard, Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State ex rel. Meighen v. WeatherillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sixty-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. BeensSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes, Governor & Board of State CanvassersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Asbury Park Press, Inc. v. WoolleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Baker v. CarrDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1962
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.