Legal Opinion
Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Barnett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 11, 1934No. 24551PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This action was instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county by the Attorney General at the direction of the Governor, and was in the nature of an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the Bank Commissioner and the Banking Board to wind up and liquidate the Depositors’ Guaranty Fund. The Attorney General alleged that he was bringing suit for the benefit of the Security Bank & Trust Company of Miami, Okla., and for the benefit of all others holding claims against the Depositors’ Guaranty Fund of the state of Oklahoma.
It is alleged that there was in said fund $214,057.70 in cash…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- French v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Louisiana v. JumelSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- City of Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Louisiana v. PilsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Mobile v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Baker v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Hammons v. Muskogee Medical Center AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- I. T. K. v. MOUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Scamman v. ScammanMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.