Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Scamman v. Scamman

Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 23, 1950No. 99401PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*273OPINION

By MILLS, J.

Plaintiff herein, executrix of the estate of George E. Scam-man, deceased, filed a petition in this court alleging that George E. Scamman died testate; that he was a resident of Scar-boro, Maine; that he died while in active duty for the United States Army on or about June 30th, 1943, and was declared officially dead by the United States Army on January 21st, 1946; that the last will and testament was duly admitted to Probate, plaintiff being named as executrix of said last will.

It appears that Mary E. Scamman is the widow of George E. Scamman, deceased, and as such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Security Bank & Trust Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Smith, Admx. v. MassieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Holmes v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
  5. Lutostanski v. LutostanskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Viers v. DunlapOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wilson v. Ac S, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Ford v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. MuqdadyCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API