Legal Opinion
Baker v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 6, 1936No. 25959PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of Tulsa county. The parties occupy the same position here as in the trial court and will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.
The question presented -by this appeal for our determination is formulated by the coh-flicting views of plaintiff and defendant in reference to the scope and effect of section 5377, C. O. S. 1921 (see. 9800, O. S. 1931), and the amendment thereof as made by chapter 54, S. L. 1938.
It appears from the record that on October 6,' 1930, one Herbert S. Corliss purchased 250 shares of the fully paid stock of the defendant Tulsa…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. WheelerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1814
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Treigle v. Acme Homestead Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- State v. JulowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Messenger v. MessengerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Baker v. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Moran v. State Ex Rel. DerryberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Wisconsin Medical Society, Inc. v. MorganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.