Legal Opinion

Berkley v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 20, 2004No. 98-943CPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for approval of the Settlement Agreement between the United States and approximately 620 former junior officers who held reserve commissions in the United States Air Force. Within four days of the filing of this opinion, the parties shall file a joint status report informing the court of the exact number and names of those plaintiffs who remain in the class. After further proceedings in the trial court and lengthy negotiations between the parties, following remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brody v. HellmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Fisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Denney v. Jenkens & GilchristDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Sabo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API