Legal Opinion
Denney v. Jenkens & Gilchrist
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 18, 2005No. 03 Civ. 5460(SAS)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*321 OPINION & ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs allege in this putative class action that defendants violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and are hable for damages and other relief arising from unjust enrichment, breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duties, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, professional malpractice, unethical, excessive and illegal fees, and conspiracy.1 On May 14, 2004, the Court prehminarily certified a settlement class and approved a proposed settlement with…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Denney v. Deutsche Bank AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re Telik, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Xcel Energy, Inc., Securities, Derivative & "ERISA" LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- In re Marsh Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.