Legal Opinion
Cosmopolitan Manufacturing Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 12, 1962No. Nos. 123-60, 168-60PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
These are two separate suits to recover the difference between the original contract price and the price actually paid plaintiffs by defendant for the manufacture of overcoats for the Army. They are before the court on defendant’s motions for summary judgment grounded on the allegation that the suits are barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiffs have also filed motions for summary judgment.1
Since all the issues presented in the case of Arlene Coats v. United States, No. 123-60, are identically presented in the ease of Cosmopolitan Manufacturing Co. v. United States, No. 168-60, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ripley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Volentine and Littleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- De Arnaud v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- United States v. William Sams Appeal of Victor CarlucciCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Crown Coat Front Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.