Legal Opinion

Young v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1944No. Civ. No. 14263PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J. pro tem.

In this proceeding we are invited to annul an order of the respondent commission denying a petition to reopen the case. The petition was based on the ground that the award which had been made was wrong, working an injustice to the petitioner. The problem presented is whether a party, claiming to be aggrieved by an award, but who failed to apply for a rehearing within the statutory time limit, can obtain a judicial review of the award by the expedient of petitioning for a reopening of the case. We have reached the conclusion that the validity of the award may not be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Sale v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Kennedy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Colonial Mutual Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rymer v. HaglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Pullman Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Nicky Blair's Restaurant v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Northern California Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API