Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. Rowan
Indiana Supreme Court
From the LaGrange Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
The first error of which complaint is made here on behalf of the appellant, the defendant below, are those which call in question the sufficiency of the facts stated in appellee’s complaint to constitute a cause of action.
This suit was commenced in the Noble Circuit Court, in this State, but afterwards, and before trial and judgment, the venue of the cause was changed to the court below. In hie complaint, the appellee alleged that appellant was a corporation, under the laws of this State, and as such owned a line of railroad running into and through Noble county, in this. State, and was and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Gibson v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Illinois Central Railroad v. WelchIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.