Legal Opinion

Bullard v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1960No. 8 Div. 695PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.

This appellant has been adjudged guilty of forgery in the second degree.

The evidence of the State tended to show that in an accounting suit in equity between the appellant and M. T. Williams, or Troy Williams, there had been marked for identification at appellant’s request a receipt for $300 allegedly signed by M. T. Williams for a payment made by appellant to Williams.

This receipt was later used by counsel for appellant in examining a witness in the equity proceedings.

There was also marked for identification a note allegedly signed by M. T. Williams and by appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Huddleston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Linnehan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Colvin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Hollis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Ex Parte RieberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Sprinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. Racine v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API