Bullard v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.
This appellant has been adjudged guilty of forgery in the second degree.
The evidence of the State tended to show that in an accounting suit in equity between the appellant and M. T. Williams, or Troy Williams, there had been marked for identification at appellant’s request a receipt for $300 allegedly signed by M. T. Williams for a payment made by appellant to Williams.
This receipt was later used by counsel for appellant in examining a witness in the equity proceedings.
There was also marked for identification a note allegedly signed by M. T. Williams and by appellant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Huddleston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Linnehan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Colvin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Hollis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Ex Parte RieberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Sprinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Racine v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.