Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 19, 1980No. 63313PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice.

This is another in a rising river of post-conviction relief proceedings in which the competency of counsel who represented petitioner in the prior criminal action is put in issue. District court denied relief and petitioner Hinkle appeals. We affirm.

Hinkle’s first-degree murder conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Hinkle, 229 N.W.2d 744 (Iowa 1975). The criminal trial transcript, made a part of this proceeding, discloses there was overwhelming evidence from which the jury could have found the following facts. Hinkle became angry because his girl friend, Patty…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Lynn G. Lamasters Vs. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. State v. McKettrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  3. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. State v. AldapeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. State v. SchoelermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API