Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 18, 1984No. 83-223PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLE, Justice.

Petitioner was convicted of first degree murder for the shotgun slaying of his wife. His direct appeal from that conviction was affirmed, but we expressly reserved for postconviction proceedings petitioner’s assertions of ineffectiveness of his trial counsel. State v. Taylor, 310 N.W.2d 174, 179 (Iowa 1981). Those claims have now been tried and decided adversely to petitioner by the postconviction trial court. We affirm.

The essentially undisputed background facts are set forth in our previous opinion and need only be summarized here. When petitioner returned from work around…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hinkle v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Fryer v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Snethen v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. State v. SchrierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. State v. SchminkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. State v. OndayogSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. State v. McKettrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. State of Iowa v. Justin Dean ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API