Legal Opinion

Old Republic Insurance v. FSR Brokerage, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 2000No. B100097PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CURRY, J.

Following a bench trial, the trial court concluded that appellant Old Republic Insurance Company (hereafter Old Republic) had not secured a right of reimbursement against respondent FSR Brokerage, Inc., doing business as Fred Sands Realtors (hereafter FSR). Subsequently, a jury found that Old Republic had engaged in bad faith by asserting a claim for fraud against FSR. We reverse the trial court’s ruling on Old Republic’s right of reimbursement, reverse the judgment on FSR’s bad faith claim, and remand for further proceedings. In so ruling, we conclude that a bad faith claim…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Jordan v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Tran v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Oakland Raiders v. Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API