Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Allstate Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 2007No. B187706PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Mary Ann Jordan, plaintiff and appellant, seeks reversal of a judgment entered in favor of respondent Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) on her complaint for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and declaratory relief. The issue presented to us is whether Jordan has a viable claim for .breach of the implied covenant; after the trial court granted Allstate’s motion for summary adjudication of that issue, Jordan dismissed her other two causes of action so that an appealable judgment could be entered.
While we agree with the trial…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Behnke v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Bosetti v. United States Life Ins. Co. in City of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Brehm v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Yan Fang Du v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Garcia v. W&W COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2010
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.