Hartz v. Eddy
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by John C. Hartz against Walter S. Eddy for rent. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action of assumpsit to recover the rent due on a lease of a salt plant made by plaintiff’s assignor, the Marine City Stave Company, to the defendant. The lease reserved a rental of $7,500 per annum, payable in monthly installments, and a further rental of one cent per barrel on all salt manufactured in excess of 30,000 barrels per annum. The lessee also agreed to purchase the stock on hand. The lease contained the further •provision that the second party was to have the privilege of making as much or as little salt as he may require, but, in case the second party or his assignees…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Foley v. DwyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Detroit Pharmacal Co. v. BurtMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Duluth Board of TradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Carrano v. ShoorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Steinberg v. FineMichigan Supreme Court · 1923