Legal Opinion

Foley v. Dwyer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1900PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by Jobn S. Foley against Jobn M. Dwyer and others upon a contract for tbe purchase of real estate. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

The plaintiff and defendants entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of certain real estate in the city of Detroit. Plaintiff declared on the contract, adding the common counts, and alleging as a breach the failure of defendants to pay taxes and interest according to its terms and provisions, and adding:

*588‘ ‘ Whereby plaintiff has been deprived of the profits and advantages which might and would otherwise have accrued to him from the performance of the said contract, and has incurred a great expense in endeavoring to procure the completion of the said purchase on tire part of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wierengo v. American Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Findlay v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ross v. Township of IoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Harrington v. HigginsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  5. Regents of the University of Michigan v. Detroit Young Men's SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sloman v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Alexander v. WingettMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Adron v. EvansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Detroit Pharmacal Co. v. BurtMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Midland County Savings Bank v. T. C. Prouty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API