Legal Opinion

Carrano v. Shoor

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment that the defendants were liable to pay him rent under the covenants of a certain lease, to reimburse him for certain taxes paid by him upon the leased property and to restore a party wall between that property and the one next adjoining. The trial court gave judgment upon all the issues in favor of the plaintiff, but held that the defendants were liable to pay rent in a smaller sum than specified in the lease. The defendant Shoor, whom we shall hereafter refer to as the defendant, has appealed from this judgment upon the ground…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Grommes v. St. Paul Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Coe v. . HobbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Agate v. . LowenbeinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Fox v. ShanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Peter-Michael, Inc. v. Sea Shell AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Water & Way Properties v. Colt's Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. In Re Wingspread Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. Horowitz v. F. E. Spencer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API