Steinberg v. Fine
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Dunham (Major L.), J., presiding. Summary proceedings by Julius Steinberg against Harry Fine for the possession of leased premises. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appealed to the circuit court by writ of certiorari. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.
This action was originally heard by the circuit court commissioner of Wayne county. Its purpose was to terminate the interest of the defendant in a certain lease of premises in Detroit, Michigan. The issue was there determined adversely to the plaintiff, who removed the case by writ of certiorari to the circuit court where he recovered a judgment for possession. The defendant is here by writ of error seeking a reversal of this judgment.
The lease in question was made on July 23, 1919, and was for a term of ten years. The parties to it were the plaintiff as lessor and defendant, Harry Fine, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foley v. DwyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Wineman v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Hartz v. EddyMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Weber v. Van Blerck Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Engel v. KlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Sanford v. SallanMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- C. J. Netting Co. v. SillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Chicago Boulevard Land Co. v. NuttenMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Marvin Okeefe ChapmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020