Legal Opinion

City of Mangum v. Todd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1914No. 3511PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Greer County; G. A. Brown, Judge. Action by Jarrct Todcl against the City of Mangum. a municipal corporation. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The controlling and all-important question in this case is; Can the owner of a lot abutting on a public street of a city of the first class recover damages purely consequential in nature, arising because of the establishment of a permanent grade, in the first instance, by the proper municipal authorities, where the establishment of the grade and the resulting improvements have been properly made without negligence ?

The First Legislature assembled after statehood passed an .act which was approved April 17, 1908 (section 722, Comp. Laws 1909; sections 608, 609, Rev. Laws…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Smith Ex Rel. Cushing v. Corporation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Ettor v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Alden v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  5. Fletcher v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. GrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. City of Tulsa v. HindmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Oldfield v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. City of Yale v. NobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Kenner v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API