Legal Opinion

Farrar v. N. C. & St. L. Ry.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Upon abandonment of a branch of its railway lines extending through Lincoln County, the defendant removed its rails and cross ties, and also executed a deed conveying two small lots of land adjacent to its right of way to one J. C. Cardy. Complainant sets up in his hill that he is the owner of the lands out of which the lots, and a portion of the railway’s right of way, were originally carved, and seeks (1) to recover the ties and rails removed, or their value, and (2) to have cancelled as a cloud the conveyance to Cardy.

Complainant’s theory with respect to the ties and rails is that they…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Carnegie Realty Co. v. Carolina, C. & O. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Southwestern Presbyterian Univ. v. ClarksvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. W. J. Savage & Co. v. MayfieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lowe v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Buhl v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Texas & N. O. R. v. SchoenfeldTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Ray v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API