Legal Opinion
Texas & N. O. R. v. Schoenfeld
Texas Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1941No. 7567PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
Mrs. Nellie G. Schoenfeld, joined by her husband, Charles M. Schoenfeld, filed this suit against the Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by virtue of the removal by the Railroad Company of its spur track which had been situated on a tract of land owned by Mrs. Schoen-feld. The case was tried before the court without the aid of a jury, and the trial court entered judgment in favor of Mrs. Schoenfeld, and against the Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company, for the sum of $2,203.12; from which judgment the Railroad Company appealed…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895
- Buffalo Bayou, Brazos & Colorado Railroad v. FerrisTexas Supreme Court · 1863
- Northern Central Railway Co. v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- West v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Ulmer v. Lime Rock RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Moore v. RotelloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- City of Fort Worth v. Southwest MagazineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Cox v. OlivardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.