Legal Opinion
Windover v. Sprague Technologies
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 25, 1993No. Civ. 5-92-164 (WWE)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Fred Windover brings this civil rights action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Plaintiff also brings a state law claim for tortious interference with a business expectancy. Defendants moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 on March 12, 1993. Plaintiff then cross-moved for summary judgment, after which defendants moved to strike evidence submitted by the plaintiff in connection with his summary judgment papers. For the reasons…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re PetersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Delacroix v. Lublin Graphics, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Central Sports, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USADistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Kaufman LLC v. Estate of Herbert FeinbergDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Solomat Partners, L.P. v. Ibar (In Re Solomat Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2001