Legal Opinion

Solomat Partners, L.P. v. Ibar (In Re Solomat Partners, L.P.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 10, 2001No. 19-50225Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT

ALBERT S. DABROWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Amended Complaint in this adversary proceeding prays for, inter alia, monetary and injunctive rehef against the Defendant as a result of his contacts with individuals and business entities within and associated with the industry in which the Plaintiffs conduct business. This Memorandum of Decision sets forth the Court’s essential findings and conclusions supporting the Judgment entered this day upon the Plaintiffs’ Complaint. For the reasons stated more fully herein, judgment must enter in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Van GorkomSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Ppx Enterprises, Inc., Mod Music, Inc., and J.H. Records, Inc., Ppx Enterprises, Inc. v. Audiofidelity Enterprises, Inc. And Dante J. PuglieseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Kathryn R. Walton and Irmgart Van Daell Heckel v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, and Olinkraft, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Stephens v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. Kirby v. WildensteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API