Legal Opinion

National Shawmut Bank v. Cumming

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 8, 1950PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiff bank is the surviving trustee under a declaration of trust, dated August 25, 1944, in which the bank and the settlor, William Gray Cumming, of Barre, Vermont, were named as trustees. The settlor died on August 19, 1947. The defendants are the settlor’s widow, Cora Mann Cumming, and the mother, brother, and three sisters of the settlor, and constitute all the surviving life beneficiaries under the trust instrument. This bill in equity seeks (1) the removal of a cloud upon the plaintiff’s title as trustee to the trust property, as well as upon the beneficial interests of the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Eaton v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Markham, etc v. FayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Rapp v. Lester L. Burdick, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Sadler v. Industrial Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  5. First Natl. Bk. of Mount Dora v. Shawmut Bk. of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API